4.7 Article

Multicomponent multiproduct closed-loop supply chain design with transshipment and economies of scale considerations

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.107073

Keywords

Closed loop supply chain; Transshipment; Economies of scale; Multicomponent products; Multiproduct systems

Funding

  1. Canadian Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an integrated model for the design of a multi-component multi-product closed-loop supply chain, considering economies of scale for processing centers, transshipment of inspected products, and reliability of returned products. The study shows that when products or parts have high reliability, the Inspection, Refurbishment and Disassembly centre capacity can be lower, but when reliability is low, greater capacity is required. In the latter case, economies of scale play a role and transshipment between centers is necessary.
With the growing awareness for sustainability, organizations have engaged in multiple initiatives to recover, remanufacture and extend the lifecycle of their products. The resulting closed-loop supply chains (CLSC) have been considerably studied under various conditions. This paper proposes an integrated model for the design of a multi-component multi-product CLSC with economies of scale for the location of processing centers, transshipment of inspected products between centers, and reliability of returned products. Multiple numerical experiments are run to show the impact of part reliability, economies of scale and transshipment on the network design decisions. When returned products or parts are highly reliable, it is found that Inspection, Refurbishment and Disassembly centre (IRDC) capacity is lower because more products are available for refurbishing or for the recovery of parts through disassembly. However, when reliability is low, greater IRDC capacity is required. This can be achieved by either increasing their number or size. In the case of the latter, it is noted that Economies of Scale (EOS) come into play. Since IRDCs are geographically dispersed in the supply chain, any network configuration model should allow for transshipment because when larger IRDCs are chosen as a result of EOS incentives, fewer of them are needed, which in turn implies transshipment between IRDCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available