Journal
COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 1-10Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2020.10.001
Keywords
Augmented reality; Visualization; 3D interaction; Situated analytics; Electromagnetic compatibility
Categories
Funding
- Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brasil (CAPES) [001]
- Fapergs-Brazil PqG2017 Project CHIHC
- Swedish Council for Higher Education (UHR)
- CNPq-Brazil [311353/2017-7]
- School of Information Technology at Halmstad University [3.3.1.34.11116-2019]
- Institute of Informatics at UFRGS [3.3.1.34.11116-2019]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In the field of electrical engineering, hardware experts analyze electromagnetic radiation data to detect interference or anomalies, a field known as electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). The use of Augmented Situated Visualization (ASV) can assist professionals in understanding data and improving decision-making.
In electrical engineering, hardware experts often need to analyze electromagnetic radiation data to detect any external interference or anomaly. The field that studies this sort of assessment is called electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). As a way to support EMC analysis, we propose the use of Augmented Situated Visualization (ASV) to supply professionals with visual and interactive information that helps them to comprehend that data, however situating it where it is most relevant in its spatial context. Users are able to interact with the visualization by changing the attributes being displayed, comparing the overlaps of multiple fields, and extracting data, as a way to refine their search. The solutions being proposed in this work were tested against each other in comparable 2D and 3D interactive visualizations of the same data in a series of data-extraction assessments with users, as a means to validate the approaches. Results exposed a correctness-time trade-off between the interaction methods. The hand-based techniques (Hand Slider and Touch Lens) were the least error-prone, being near to half as error-inducing as the gaze-based method. Touch Lens also performed as the least time-consuming method, taking in average less than half of the average time required by the others. For the visualization methods tested, the 2D ray casts presented a higher usability score and lesser workload index than the 3D topology view, however exposing over two times the error ratio. Ultimately, this work exposes how AR can help users to have better performances in a decision-making context, particularly in EMC related tasks, while also furthering the research in the ASV field. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available