4.7 Article

OptiSMOKE plus plus : A toolbox for optimization of chemical kinetic mechanisms

Journal

COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 264, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107940

Keywords

Optimization; Chemical kinetics; Combustion

Funding

  1. COST, Belgium (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CM1404]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [643134]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [714605]
  4. Funds pour la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS), Belgium through a FRIA fellowship of the project HOPTIMAL: Hierarchical development of OPTimised kinetic Mechanisms for Advanced combustion technoLogies''

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An adaptable chemical kinetics optimization toolbox has been developed in this work, which can handle a large number of uncertain parameters and utilize various optimization methodologies. The toolbox is capable of handling experimental targets from different sources, showcasing its versatility in predicting chemical reactions.
As detailed chemical mechanisms are becoming viable for large scale simulations, knowledge and control of the uncertainty correlated to the kinetic parameters are becoming crucial to ensure accurate numerical predictions. A flexible toolbox for the optimization of chemical kinetics has therefore been developed in this work. The toolbox is able to use different optimization methodologies, as well as it can handle a large amount of uncertain parameters simultaneously. It can also handle experimental targets from different sources: Batch reactors, Plug Flow Reactors, Perfectly Stirred Reactors, Rapid Compression Machines and Laminar Flame Speeds. This work presents the different features of this toolbox together with five different test cases which exemplifies these features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available