4.5 Review

HISTORICAL RESPONSE RATES OF SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUES IN THE TREATMENT OF ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Journal

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 350-356

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4158/EP15913.RA

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In a completed phase III study (C2305, Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00600886), the reported rate of biochemical control with octreotide long-acting release (LAR) was lower than rates historically reported in patients pretreated and/or selected for response with somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy. To assess whether lower efficacy rates of octreotide LAR in C2305 were influenced by study design, a systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate response rates in previously published studies in acromegaly with similar design characteristics. Methods: PubMed was used to search for English-language clinical studies of acromegaly published through May 2014. Prospective studies of medically naive patients (>= 20) treated with SSAs for <= 12 months that reported efficacy rates using composite endpoint measures (growth hormone [GH] and insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1]) were included. Two separate authors independently screened abstracts and full-length articles of each study to determine eligibility. All authors met to review and reach consensus when primary reviewers disagreed on the inclusion or exclusion of specific studies. Results: A total of 9 studies (N = 354 patients) were identified, with reported mean efficacy rates of 31% (range, 20-54%). Of note, reported mean efficacy rates were lower in studies enrolling patients naive to any form of treatment (surgery, medical, and/or radiation) than in studies that enrolled only medically naive patients. A limitation of this analysis was that inclusion criteria restricted the number of studies analyzed. Conclusion: Interpretation of biochemical response rates with SSAs is critically dependent on the context of the study and should be evaluated across clinical trials with similar study design characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available