4.5 Article

Segregation and embrittlement of gold grain boundaries

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110110

Keywords

Grain boundary segregation; First principles calculations; Mechanical properties; Eshelby model; Experimental validation

Funding

  1. COMET program within the K2 Center Integrated Computational Material, Process and Product Engineering (IC-MPPE) [859480]
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK)
  3. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW)
  4. federal state of Styria
  5. federal state of Upper Austria
  6. federal state of Tyrol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the segregation behaviors of 27 alloying elements to an Au grain boundary and surface, identifying both detrimental and beneficial elements for alloying. The methodology and results are validated by comparing to experimental results from over two centuries, revealing the main origin of the grain boundary cohesion effect.
Grain boundary (GB) segregation of solutes can significantly alter material properties, the effects of which have first been observed more than two hundred years ago. After an introduction that shortly summarizes the historic development of the study of segregation, this work conducts an investigation on the segregation tendencies of 27 alloying elements to an Au GB and a surface with first principles calculations, semi-empirical modelling, and a phenomenological model of segregation. The effect of alloying elements on GB cohesion are evaluated and both detrimental (Bi, Cl, As, K) and beneficial elements (Al and the 3d transition metals) for alloying are identified. By comparing to experimental results from over two centuries, the used methodology and the obtained results are validated. The main origin of the GB cohesion effect can be revealed, i.e. the size mismatch between alloying elements and Au.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available