4.7 Article

Luffa Cylindrica as a durable biofiber reinforcement for epoxy systems

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108597

Keywords

Natural fibres; Natural fibre composites; Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs) creep; Material modelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Luffa Cylindrica, a dried fruit of a sponge-type plant, shows potential for replacing conventional porous composites due to its unique multi-porous structure. Impregnating Luffa Cylindrica with epoxy resin results in improved viscoelastic properties, with a 30% decrease in creep strain and compliance.
Luffa Cylindrica (LC) is the dried fruit of a sponge-type plant belonging to Curcubitacea family. Recent advancements in hierarchical and lightweight structures have aroused interest in this natural fibrous material for illustrating an extraordinary multi-porous architecture of high anisotropy and low density. To the extent of its biodegradable nature, such a structure is potentially apt to replace conventional porous-like composites for low-energy absorbing and material reinforcing applications. In order to investigate its candidacy as a long-term sustainable reinforcement, a LC layer is impregnated with an epoxy resin (ER) system and subjected to tensile creep tests within the linear viscoelastic regime. Specimens loaded with 30% weight fraction of LC fibers are tested at four stress levels corresponding to 5%, 8%, 10% and 15% of the static tensile strength sigma(u) of the composite. The viscoelastic response of the LC/ER composite is found improved with respect to that of the pure polymer. This improvement is reflected to the creep strain and compliance that decreased by 30%. The creep results are subsequently probed by means of the four-parameter (Burger) analytical model to gain insight on the viscoelastic behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available