4.7 Article

Multi-failure analyses of additively manufactured lattice truss sandwich cylinders

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108561

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Lattice sandwich cylinder; Failure analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972184, 11671230]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFB1102800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Innovative sandwich cylinders with pyramidal lattice truss-cores were designed, printed, tested, and analyzed using selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing (AM) technique. Uniaxial compression tests of two groups of aluminum alloy sandwich cylinders showed failure at facesheet yielding, followed by post-plastic local buckling. A new multi-failure theory was proposed to predict plastic buckling load and provide a hierarchical failure map for optimal design of additively manufactured lattice-core sandwich cylinders.
Innovative sandwich cylinders with pyramidal lattice truss-cores were designed, printed, tested and analyzed. The selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing (AM) technique was applied to ensure the quality of the structure, including the diameter of lattice struts, the thickness of inner and outer skins, and the joints between the skins and the lattice struts. Uniaxial compression tests of two groups of aluminum alloy sandwich cylinders were performed. The testing results showed that the cylinders failed at the facesheet yielding, which was followed by the post-plastic local buckling. A new multi-failure theory was proposed, which can consistently predict the plastic buckling load and provide a hierarchical failure map by covering all elastic and plastic buckling modes. The newly proposed multi-failure theory provides a method for the optimal design of additively manufactured lattice-core sandwich cylinders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available