4.5 Article

The Influence of Fair Value Measurement on Radical Financing of Irrational Managers Based on Fixed Effects Model and Fisher Permutation Test

Journal

COMPLEXITY
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5513204

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Anhui Provincial Department of Education Quality Engineering Project (Planning Textbook), Economic Benefit Audit [2017ghjc119]
  2. Anhui Provincial Department of Education Quality Engineering Project (MOOC), Audit [2018mooc055]
  3. Major Project of the Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education Accounting Measurement Model, Report Model and Enterprise Comprehensive Report [16JJD790035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that overconfident managers in companies adopting fair value measurement are more likely to make aggressive debt decisions, indicating that fair value measurement has a positively regulatory effect on overconfident managers.
Adopting fair value measurement may bring more earnings fluctuations and induce irrational psychology and radical financing behavior of managers. Based on behavioral corporate governance theory, using the sample of Chinese A-share nonfinancial listed companies during 2007-2017, this paper empirically examines the regulatory effect of fair value measurement, that is, whether fair value measurement affects the company's financing decisions when managers have irrational psychological characteristics, i.e., overconfidence. The study found that overconfident managers of the company that have fair value measurement assets will be more aggressive for debt decisions, indicating that fair value measurement has a positively regulatory effect on overconfident managers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available