4.4 Review

Current Application of Chemometrics Analysis in Authentication of Natural Products: A Review

Journal

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1386207324666210309102239

Keywords

Natural products; chemometrics; spectroscopic; chromatographic; quality control; authentication

Funding

  1. Research Deanship of the University of Ha'il, Saudi Arabia [RG-20 101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a concise review of the application of chemometrics in solving the uncertainty of herbal medicine authentication over the past two decades. The results show that these methods have played an important role in the quality control and authentication of herbal medicines.
Background: The efficiency of herbal medicinal products depends on the quantity of active ingredients in them, which can vary considerably in different contents. Hence, the quality control of herbal medicines is a critical concern. Objective: This paper aims to provide a succinct review of recent chemometrics applications in solving the uncertainty of the authentication of herbal medicines over the last two decades. Methods: Studies involving chemometrics applications in conjunction with various analytical methods have been categorized according to the type of research used in the quality evaluation of different samples, including chromatographic (HPLC, GC-MS) and spectroscopic analysis (UV-Vis, FTIR, NMR, and MS). Results: This review consists of over 90 studies illustrating the relevance of chemometrics methods in the discrimination based on the key bioactive components and phytochemical diversity of several herbs from closely related species. In addition to the prediction of the active components, the distinction between varieties and hybrids was accomplished through quantitative analysis techniques. Conclusion: Methods of chemometrics have provided an important and potent tool for the quality control and authentication of various herbs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available