4.4 Article

Idiopathic and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia associated pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: comparison of clinical and radiographic characteristics

Journal

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.01.011

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are differences in clinical and radiographic characteristics between idiopathic and hereditary HHT-associated PAVMs. However, the outcomes of embolotherapy are comparable, suggesting similar treatment and follow-up approaches should be taken for both groups.
AIM: To determine whether there are differences between idiopathic and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) associated pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) (HHT-PAVM) regarding clinical and radiographic characteristics, and the results of embolotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all adult and adolescent patients who were diagnosed with a PAVM on chest computed tomography (CT) from January 2006 until August 2019. RESULTS: In total, 41 patients with idiopathic PAVMs and 194 patients with genetically confirmed HHT and PAVMs were included. Idiopathic PAVMs were more frequently observed in female patients, were more solitary, and predominantly located in the lower lobes. The diameter of the feeding artery and type of PAVM (simple versus complex) were similar. Embolotherapy results were comparable between both groups with similar re-embolisation rates. CONCLUSIONS: PAVMs of idiopathic origin are predominantly found in women, more frequently located in the lower lobes, and solitary compared to HHT-PAVMs; however, the outcome of treatment is the same, suggesting that treatment and follow-up should be similar in both groups. (C) 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available