4.5 Article

Heterozygous NOTCH1 deletion associated with variable congenital heart defects

Journal

CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 99, Issue 6, Pages 836-841

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.13948

Keywords

9q34; 3 deletion; congenital heart defects; hypoplastic left heart; NOTCH1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pathogenic heterozygous variants in the NOTCH1 gene are associated with both left and right-sided congenital cardiac anomalies, while de novo NOTCH1 whole gene deletion is rarely reported in literature. The four cases of NOTCH1 gene deletion from two families showed a spectrum of congenital heart defects, suggesting a unique high penetrance associated with haploinsufficiency caused by NOTCH1 gene deletion. These cases also demonstrated reduced levels of NOTCH1 expression in cardiac tissue, indicating a potential mechanism of disease.
Pathogenic heterozygous variants in the NOTCH1 gene are known to be associated with both left and right-sided congenital cardiac anomalies with strikingly incomplete penetrance and variable phenotypic expressivity. De novo NOTCH1 whole gene deletion has been reported rarely in the literature and its association with cardiac defects is less well established. Here, we report four cases of NOTCH1 gene deletion from two families associated with a spectrum of congenital heart defects from bicuspid aortic valve to complex cardiac anomalies. This is the first description of a familial NOTCH1 deletion, showing apparently high penetrance, which may be unique to this mechanism of disease. Immunohistochemical staining of cardiac tissue demonstrated reduced levels of NOTCH1 expression in both the left and right ventricular outflow tracts. These cases suggest that haploinsufficiency caused by NOTCH1 gene deletion is associated with both mild and severe cardiac defects, similar to those caused by pathogenic variants in the gene, but with apparently higher, if not complete, penetrance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available