4.7 Review

Evolving Status of Clinical Immunotherapy with Oncolytic Adenovirus

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 2979-2988

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1565

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [BIO2017-89754-C2-1-R]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017SGR449]
  3. AGAUR [2015 DI 0070]
  4. European Regional Development Fund, a way to Build Europe
  5. Centres de Recerca de Catalunya (CERCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer immunotherapy utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown effectiveness in various human cancers, but cold tumors often lack immune cells and are typically unresponsive. Oncolytic viruses, with their lytic and immunogenic mechanisms, have attracted interest as potential therapeutic approaches to heat or promote lymphocyte infiltration of cold tumors. This article reviews the use of oncolytic adenoviruses in cancer immunotherapy, focusing on immune responses triggered by these viruses against tumor antigens in preclinical and clinical settings, as well as considerations for clinical trial design and combination therapies with conventional treatments or other immunotherapies.
Cancer immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors shows efficacy in several human cancers, but cold tumors that lack immune cells are typically unresponsive. Among the potential therapeutic approaches that could heat or promote lymphocyte infiltration of cold tumors, oncolytic viruses have attracted interest for their lytic and immunogenic mechanisms of action. In this article, we review the use of oncolytic adenoviruses in cancer immunotherapy, with a particular focus on preclinical and clinical data of oncolytic adenovirus-triggered immune responses against tumor antigens. We also discuss parameters to consider in clinical trial design and the combination of oncolytic adenoviruses with conventional treatments or other immunotherapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available