Journal
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 41-47Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878864
Keywords
Dual-focus contact lens; multifocal contact lens; tear film stability
Categories
Funding
- University of Valencia through the 'Atraccio de Talent' scholarship [UV-INV_PREDOC18F2-886420]
- Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PTDC/SAU-BEB/098391/2008, PTDC/FIS-OPT/0677/2014]
- FCT Strategic Funding [UID/FIS/04650/2013]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that the dual-focus contact lens design compared to the monofocal lens resulted in a slight reduction in short-term pre-lens tear film stability, potentially affecting visual performance and comfort during dual-focus contact lens wear.
Background: To compare the short-term effect of two contact lenses on pre-lens tear film stability and comfort: dual-focus contact lens (MiSight) and a monofocal contact lens (Proclear 1-day). Methods: This randomised, double-masked, crossover study was performed in twenty-eight healthy, myopic volunteers aged between 18 and 32 years (23.5 +/- 4.1 years). Only one randomly chosen eye was assessed. Distance vision and refraction were evaluated at baseline. Each contact lens type (monofocal and dual-focus) was randomly fitted, always in both eyes. A visual analogue scale between 0 and 10 was used to assess general comfort, physical comfort, and visual comfort. Tear Film Surface Quality (TFSQ) index, TFSQ_area and auto Tear Break-Up Time were obtained using Medmont E-300 at baseline (naked eye condition) and 25 minutes after each contact lens insertion. Results: Refractive sphere and cylinder were, respectively, -1.36 +/- 1.04 D (ranging from -6.00 to -0.25 D) and -0.23 +/- 0.30 D (ranging from -0.75 to 0.00 D). TFSQ and TFSQ area were lower (meaning more stable tear film) at baseline when compared with both contact lens types (p < 0.025). Higher pre-lens tear instability (larger TFSQ and_TFSQ area values) was found with the dual-focus than the monofocal lens. Auto Tear Break-Up Time was higher at baseline than with each of the contact lenses, without statistically significant differences between both contact lens types. Visual analogue scales revealed statistically significant better scores in the monofocal contact lens than in dual-focus contact lens for general (0.77 +/- 1.14 vs 3.12 +/- 2.79), physical (0.96 +/- 1.46 vs 2.19 +/- 2.45) and visual comfort (1.27 +/- 1.66 vs 3.92 +/- 2.04). Conclusion: A slight reduction in short-term pre-lens tear film stability was found in the dual-focus design in comparison with the monofocal lens, potentially contributing to the deterioration of visual performance and comfort during dual-focus contact lens wear.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available