4.6 Article

Control and Implementation of 2-DOF Lower Limb Exoskeleton Experiment Platform

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s10033-021-00537-8

Keywords

Lower limb exoskeleton; BP neural network; Backstepping controller; Variable admittance strategy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775089, 12072068, 11872147]
  2. Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program of China [2020YFG0137, 2018JY0565]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel algorithm and controllers to enhance the comfort and performance of a lower limb exoskeleton, achieving passive position control and active follow-up control for the exoskeleton.
In this study, a humanoid prototype of 2-DOF (degrees of freedom) lower limb exoskeleton is introduced to evaluate the wearable comfortable effect between person and exoskeleton. To improve the detection accuracy of the human-robot interaction torque, a BPNN (backpropagation neural networks) is proposed to estimate this interaction force and to compensate for the measurement error of the 3D-force/torque sensor. Meanwhile, the backstepping controller is designed to realize the exoskeleton's passive position control, which means that the person passively adapts to the exoskeleton. On the other hand, a variable admittance controller is used to implement the exoskeleton's active follow-up control, which means that the person's motion is motivated by his/her intention and the exoskeleton control tries best to improve the human-robot wearable comfortable performance. To improve the wearable comfortable effect, serval regular gait tasks with different admittance parameters and step frequencies are statistically performed to obtain the optimal admittance control parameters. Finally, the BPNN compensation algorithm and two controllers are verified by the experimental exoskeleton prototype with human-robot cooperative motion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available