Journal
CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 567, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120127
Keywords
Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit; Sulfur isotopes; Magmatic volatiles; Trace elements; Metal source; Mafic VMS deposits; Ophiolites; Disproportionation
Categories
Funding
- Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) [NE/M010848/1]
- NERC Isotope Geosciences Facilities Steering Committee [IP-1766-1117]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Reconciling observations between ancient volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) and actively forming seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits is critical for understanding the sources and processes that govern metal enrichment in marine hydrothermal systems. The Mala VMS mound located within the Troodos ophiolite in Cyprus exhibits unusual features that have only been observed in actively forming SMS deposits, suggesting a magmatic volatile contribution in the early stages of mafic VMS deposit formation.
Reconciling observations between ancient volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) and actively forming seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits is critical for understanding the sources and processes that govern metal enrichment in marine hydrothermal systems. For a mafic VMS deposit, the Mala VMS mound located within the Troodos ophiolite, Cyprus, is unusual as pyrite is enriched in magmatic volatile elements (Au, Cu, Te and Se), sulfide delta S-34 values average -3.8 parts per thousand +/- 1.9 parts per thousand (1 sigma, n = 28), and gypsum averages +14.5 parts per thousand +/- 2.0 parts per thousand (1 sigma, n = 26) - in stark contrast to the bulk of Troodos VMS pyrite, which averages +4.6 parts per thousand +/- 2.8 parts per thousand. To date, this combination of features has only been observed in actively forming SMS deposits in immature, subduction-influenced environments and rarely in ancient VMS deposits hosted in felsic environments. Traditionally, the leaching of igneous rocks is considered as the primary source of metals in mafic VMS deposits. However, at Mala, and perhaps other active SMS deposits in mafic environments, we suggest that Au, Cu, Te and Se were initially sourced from the direct contribution of a magmatic volatile phase where SO2 underwent disproportionation, a signature that is later overprinted by reacted seawater during deposit maturation and is therefore not usually preserved in ancient analogues. Thus, the exceptional preservation of Mala provides evidence of a magmatic volatile contribution in the early stages of mafic VMS deposit formation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available