4.6 Article

Hydrodynamics and mass transfer of Taylor bubbles flowing in non-Newtonian fluids in a microchannel

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116299

Keywords

Non-Newtonian fluids; Microreactor; Transport; Mass transfer; Absorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676263, 21991103, 91634204]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2017229]
  3. Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics [DICP I201925]
  4. Dalian Science & Technology Innovation Fund [2018J11CY019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the mass transfer of Taylor bubbles in non-Newtonian fluids using an oxygen-sensitive colorimetric method, revealing the significant effects of fluid rheology on the operation range, bubble length, and shape. A mass transfer model is proposed, showing higher contribution of the film in shear-thinning fluids compared to Newtonian fluids.
The paper presents a study on the mass transfer of Taylor bubbles flowing in non-Newtonian fluids (slug flow) using an oxygen-sensitive colorimetric method, for the bubble formation and flow stages. The effects of fluid rheology on the operation range, bubble length and bubble shape are first presented, showing that they can be well described by the effective viscosity. The concentration distribution and k(L)a are also altered by the fluid rheology. Such effect highly depends on the flow rates, leading to distinct phenomena under small and high flow rates. Nevertheless, for all the fluid systems the mass transfer can be described by three parts, the transfer through the caps, through the lateral film and the film-slug exchange. A mass transfer model is proposed accordingly, which shows a larger contribution of the film (20%-60%) in shear-thinning fluids than that in the Newtonian fluid (10%-25%). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available