4.7 Article

Collective steady-state patterns of swarmalators with finite-cutoff interaction distance

Journal

CHAOS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0038591

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2018R1A2B6001790, 2021R1A2B5B01001951, 2018R1D1A1B07049254]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07049254, 2021R1A2B5B01001951, 2018R1A2B6001790] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the steady-state patterns of population of coupled oscillators with a finite-cutoff in the interaction distance, revealing new static patterns that emerge only when a finite-cutoff is considered. Existing static patterns from infinite-cutoff, such as static sync, static async, and static phase waves, are repeated and deformed in space for different finite-cutoff ranges. Unique bar-like phase wave states are observed, presenting a deviation from the patterns seen in infinite-cutoff scenarios.
We study the steady-state patterns of population of the coupled oscillators that sync and swarm, where the interaction distances among the oscillators have a finite-cutoff in the interaction distance. We examine how the static patterns known in the infinite-cutoff are reproduced or deformed and explore a new static pattern that does not appear until a finite-cutoff is considered. All steady-state patterns of the infinite-cutoff, static sync, static async, and static phase wave are repeated in space for proper finite-cutoff ranges. Their deformation in shape and density takes place for the other finite-cutoff ranges. Bar-like phase wave states are observed, which has not been the case for the infinite-cutoff. All the patterns are investigated via numerical and theoretical analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available