4.7 Article

Direct foaming of macroporous ceramics containing colloidal alumina

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 15237-15244

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.086

Keywords

Colloidal alumina; Direct foaming; Liquid foam; Particle-stabilised foam; Foam stability

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brazil (CAPES) [001, 88882.332705/2019-01]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - Brazil (CNPq) [130843/2018-0]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo - Brazil (FAPESP) [2018/07745-5]
  4. FIRE - International Federation for Refractory Research and Education
  5. Imerys
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [18/07745-5] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid foams containing Al2O3 nanoparticles can be used to process macroporous refractory ceramics with higher porosity, a higher number of small pores, and lower linear shrinkage after firing at 1600 degrees C for 5 hours.
Liquid foams containing Al2O3 nanoparticles were obtained after direct foaming of a colloidal alumina suspension with ammonium stearate. These systems were stable for at least 24 h and were comprised by small cells (35 mu m). Up to 10 wt% of these foams were added to an ultrastable Al2O3-stabilised one and resulted in macroporous samples with high total porosity (>70%). Their green mechanical strength was proportional to the amount of colloidal alumina added, but lower than a composition with calcium aluminate cement. When compared with compositions prepared with colloidal alumina suspension, the colloidal foams resulted in samples with a higher number of small pores (<30 mu m) and lower linear shrinkage after firing at 1600 degrees C for 5 h (similar to 9%). Thus, colloidal alumina foams can be used for processing macroporous refractory ceramics with smaller pores, lower dimensional changes after firing and higher porosity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available