4.7 Article

Paper sizing with gelatine: from the macro- to the nano-scale

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 2419-2432

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03655-z

Keywords

ATR-FTIR; Gelatine; Paper fibre; Sizing; STXM imaging

Funding

  1. French state funds [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]
  2. French ministry of culture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that, although different gelatines showed similar uptake at the same concentration, there were significant differences in penetration strength and surface coverage capacity. Additionally, gelatin was found to coat fibers without penetrating them.
Gelatine sizing was used extensively for western papermaking before the nineteenth century and this technique is still applied nowadays for restoration purposes. Despite its wide use, the relationships between gelatine types, the strength of the size and its distribution inside the paper sheet are still unclear. Different concentrations of three gelatines of various origins and types (A/B) were used to size model papers. The gelatine uptake, the strength of the size and the presence of gelatine at the papers surface were investigated by using a water drop test method and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. At a given concentration, similar uptakes were found for all gelatines but great variations were observed in terms of size strength and of gelatine ability to cover the surface of paper sheets. In addition, Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy was performed on paper fibres cross sections to map the distribution of the organic compounds (both cellulosic and proteinaceous) on a nanometer scale. This showed that gelatine coats but does not penetrate the fibres. It can be inferred that the different size strengths observed between the tested gelatines are mainly due to different ways of filling holes between fibres inside the paper mat, some gelatines being more prone to go inside the sheet than others which remain mostly distributed near the surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available