4.7 Article

Diffusion of polyethyleneimine with different molecular weights into cotton fibers at low concentration

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages 3997-4008

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-03795-w

Keywords

Diffusion; Polyethyleneimine; Cotton fiber; Molecular weight; Fluorescence microscopy

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0309603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the adsorption and diffusion behavior of polyethyleneimine with different molecular weights on cotton fibers, and found that the adsorption behavior of polyethyleneimine is highly dependent on its molecular weight, with different molecular weights showing varied reactions and diffusion on cotton fibers.
The adsorption and diffusion behavior of polyethyleneimine with different molecular weights on cotton fibers was evaluated at a typical concentration of 1 g/L in textile industry by titration and fluorescence labeling techniques. Directly observing the penetration extent of fluorescently labelled polyethyleneimine inside the pore structure of cotton fiber by fluorescent microscopy provided the underlying mechanism for the traditional titration methods. The adsorption behavior of polyethyleneimine was shown to be highly dependent on its molecular weight. Polyethyleneimine with molecular weight of 10,000 was limited to the outermost surface of the yarn, and polyethyleneimine with molecular weight of 1800 uniformly adsorbed on the single fiber with few of them diffusing inside the fiber, while polyethyleneimine with molecular weight of 600 easily penetrated into the pores throughout the fiber cell wall. Additionally, extending the time, increasing the temperature, adjusting the pH and increasing the PEI concentration can also promote the diffusion of PEI into the fiber to a certain extent. Graphic abstract The distribution of labelled PEI on the cotton yarn

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available