4.8 Review

Adapting the proteostasis capacity to sustain brain healthspan

Journal

CELL
Volume 184, Issue 6, Pages 1545-1560

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ANID/FONDAP program [15150012]
  2. Millenium Institute grant [P09-015-F]
  3. FONDEF [ID16I10223, D11E1007]
  4. FONDECYT [1180186]
  5. Ecos-Conicyt grant [C17S02]
  6. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant [20RT0419]
  7. Michael J. Fox Foundation (Parkinson's research target grant) [12473.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maintaining neuronal proteostasis is crucial for brain function throughout our lifespan. As we age, the decline in proteostasis network activity may increase the risk of neurodegenerative diseases characterized by abnormal protein aggregates.
Sustaining neuronal proteostasis during the course of our life is a central aspect required for brain function. The dynamic nature of synaptic composition and abundance is a requisite to drive cognitive and motor processes involving a tight control of many aspects of protein biosynthesis and degradation. Through the concerted action of specialized stress sensors, the proteostasis network monitors and limits the accumulation of damaged, misfolded, or aggregated proteins. These stress pathways signal to the cytosol and nucleus to reprogram gene expression, enabling adaptive programs to recover cell function. During aging, the activity of the proteostasis network declines, which may increase the risk of accumulating abnormal protein aggregates, a hallmark of most neurodegenerative diseases. Here, I discuss emerging concepts illustrating the functional significance of adaptive signaling pathways to normal brain physiology and their contribution to age-related disorders. Pharmacological and gene therapy strategies to intervene and boost proteostasis are expected to extend brain healthspan and ameliorate disease states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available