4.8 Article

Dissecting the contribution of host genetics and the microbiome in complex behaviors

Journal

CELL
Volume 184, Issue 7, Pages 1740-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 MH112356, R01 HL122593, R01 DK114034, 2T32AI060537-16]
  2. Sammons Enterprise
  3. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRR-42-16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The core symptoms of many neurological disorders are thought to be caused by genetic variants affecting brain development and function. However, this study found that maladaptive behaviors may be interdependently regulated by the host genes and the microbiome. By selectively intervening with the microbiome, specific behavioral deficits can be rescued, which may change our understanding of neurological disorders.
The core symptoms of many neurological disorders have traditionally been thought to be caused by genetic variants affecting brain development and function. However, the gut microbiome, another important source of variation, can also influence specific behaviors. Thus, it is critical to unravel the contributions of host genetic variation, the microbiome, and their interactions to complex behaviors. Unexpectedly, we discovered that different maladaptive behaviors are interdependently regulated by the microbiome and host genes in the Cntnap2(-/-) model for neurodevelopmental disorders. The hyperactivity phenotype of Cntnap2(-/-) mice is caused by host genetics, whereas the social-behavior phenotype is mediated by the gutmicrobiome. Interestingly, specific microbial intervention selectively rescued the social deficits in Cntnap2(-/-) mice through upregulation of metabolites in the tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis pathway. Our findings that behavioral abnormalities could have distinct origins (host genetic versus microbial) may change the way we think about neurological disorders and how to treat them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available