4.7 Review

The integrated stress response

Journal

EMBO REPORTS
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 1374-1395

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201642195

Keywords

activating transcription factor 4; eIF2 alpha kinase; eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha; integrated stress response

Funding

  1. Health Research Board [HRA/2009/59, HRA-POR-2014-643]
  2. Belgian Science Policy Office Interuniversity Attraction Poles program [IAP 7/32]
  3. Breast Cancer Campaign grant [2010NovPR13]
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) grant cofunded under the European Regional Development Fund [13/RC/2073]
  5. Irish Research Council Scholarship [GOIPG/2014/508]
  6. Thomas Crawford Hayes Fund
  7. Irish Research Council Fellowship [GOIPD/2014/53]
  8. Breast Cancer Campaign [2010NovPR13] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Health Research Board (HRB) [HRA-2009-59, HRA-POR-2014-643] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In response to diverse stress stimuli, eukaryotic cells activate a common adaptive pathway, termed the integrated stress response (ISR), to restore cellular homeostasis. The core event in this pathway is the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha) by one of four members of the eIF2 alpha kinase family, which leads to a decrease in global protein synthesis and the induction of selected genes, including the transcription factor ATF4, that together promote cellular recovery. The gene expression program activated by the ISR optimizes the cellular response to stress and is dependent on the cellular context, as well as on the nature and intensity of the stress stimuli. Although the ISR is primarily a pro-survival, homeostatic program, exposure to severe stress can drive signaling toward cell death. Here, we review current understanding of the ISR signaling and how it regulates cell fate under diverse types of stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available