4.8 Article

Resonance structures and aromaticity in capped carbon nanotubes

Journal

CARBON
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 1082-1092

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.076

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Fullerenes; Aromaticity; pi-systems; Kekule structures; Clar number

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the influence of different chiral indices on the conjugated pi-systems in capped nanotubes, revealing a fully conjugated pi-system along the nanotube's cylinder when the chiral index n-m is a multiple of 3, while fracture lines break the pattern if it is not a multiple of 3. These results are closely related to whether the nanotube is metallic or semiconductor.
The shape of a single-walled carbon nanotube's cylinder is described by its chiral indices, (n,m), and important properties of the nanotube are determined by this pair of values. In particular, a nanotube is metallic or quasi-metallic when n-m is a multiple of 3, and is otherwise a semiconductor. This paper characterizes the conjugated pi-systems that can form on capped nanotubes in each case. When n-m is a multiple of 3, there is a fully conjugated pi-system running along the nanotube's cylinder such that two-thirds of the hexagons are benzene rings and one-third are in a resonant set. In contrast, when n-m is not a multiple of 3, the pattern is broken along the length of the cylinder by two fracture lines. Surprisingly, and contrary to conventional thinking, these results are completely independent of the nanotube caps. The results are related to a similar characterization for open nanotubes by Ormsby and King, although in that case only a single fracture line is necessary. This new work is backed by the authors' previous results on the Clar numbers of fullerenes in general. It also provides new predictions for nanotubes and introduces the concept of the aromaticity ratio. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available