4.7 Article

Safe engineering of CAR T cells for adoptive cell therapy of cancer using long-term episomal gene transfer

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 702-711

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201505869

Keywords

CAR T cells; episomal cell engineering; non-integrating lentivirus (NILV); scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR) element; self-replicating DNA

Funding

  1. Swedish Children Cancer Foundation
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Gunnar Nilsson's Cancer Foundation
  5. Medical Faculty of Uppsala University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a new successful treatment for refractory B-cell leukemia. Successful therapeutic outcome depends on long-term expression of CAR transgene in T cells, which is achieved by delivering transgene using integrating gamma retrovirus (RV) or lentivirus (LV). However, uncontrolled RV/LV integration in host cell genomes has the potential risk of causing insertional mutagenesis. Herein, we describe a novel episomal long-term cell engineering method using non-integrating lentiviral (NILV) vector containing a scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR) element, for either expression of transgenes or silencing of target genes. The insertional events of this vector into the genome of host cells are below detection level. CD19 CAR T cells engineered with a NILV-S/MAR vector have similar levels of CAR expression as T cells engineered with an integrating LV vector, even after numerous rounds of cell division. NILV-S/MAR-engineered CD19 CAR T cells exhibited similar cytotoxic capacity upon CD19+ target cell recognition as LV-engineered T cells and are as effective in controlling tumor growth in vivo. We propose that NILV-S/MAR vectors are superior to current options as they enable long-term transgene expression without the risk of insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available