4.6 Article

Kinematic process and mechanism of the two slope failures at Baige Village in the upper reaches of the Jinsha River, China

Journal

BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 3475-3493

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-021-02146-0

Keywords

Baige landslide; Mechanism; Kinematic process; Landslide dam; Initial speed; Waterjet erosion

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC15050006]
  2. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program [2019QZKK0905]
  3. Natural Resources Bureau of Changdu City
  4. Tibetan Autonomous Region, Sichuan Bureau of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute (CREEI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on two rockslides that occurred on October 10th and November 3rd, 2018 in Baige Village, Jiangda County, Tibetan Autonomous Region, China. The research aimed to clarify the geological conditions of the slides and understand the reasons behind the occurrences. The analysis revealed that the landslides were a result of geological structures and river erosion, with estimated speeds reaching up to 67 m/s.
On Oct. 10 and Nov. 3, 2018, two landslides, i.e., the 10.10 and 11.3 rockslides, occurred successively at Baige Village, Jiangda County, Tibetan Autonomous Region, P. R. China. The two landslides are located in the upper reaches of the Jinsha River and both dammed the river. Immediately since the slides, the authors have been working on the slides and help disaster reduction. Based on the data collected by April 2020, this paper is aimed at clarifying the geological condition of the slides and at explaining why the slides occurred and what the whole sliding process was. Conclusions are summarized as follows. First, the two landslides occurred in the suture belt of the Jinsha River and the rocks are composed of tectonic melange slices of mainly gneiss intermingled with carboniferous slate and marble and with intruded serpentine and granite porphyry. The gneiss generally bears a schistosity plane with an averaged attitude of N47 degrees W/47 degrees, dipping into the slope. Secondly, long-term geomorphological evolution of the bank slope due to river incision contributed to the progressive slope deformation for the development of the 10.10 rockslide. No preferential joints exist in the slope, but alteration and weathering played important roles in its occurrences. Rainfall and earthquakes may also accelerate its deformation. Thirdly, the 10.10 rockslide is of high-speed wedge-like slope failure with a high-position and a high-shear outlet. Its sliding and deposition process demonstrate special features as initial speed, collision between debris, surging waterjet, and second slipping. Fourthly, the whole process of the 10.10 rockslide can be divided into 6 steps, i.e., startup of the major sliding and sliding resistance zones, sliding initiation of the trailing zone, formation of debris-eroded zones, collision of debris and triggering waterjet and mist, secondary slip of the landslide dam, and surface flush in the deposition area. The estimated speed may reach as high as 67 m/s. Fifthly, the 11.3 rockslide follows a different mode, i.e., wedge cleaving effect. And finally, the cracked zones still have the risk to constitute a potential landslide and to dam the river again.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available