4.6 Article

Eye health indicators for universal health coverage: results of a global expert prioritisation process

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 7, Pages 893-901

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318481

Keywords

public health

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [207472/Z/17/Z]
  2. Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust
  3. Moorfields Eye Charity [GR001061]
  4. NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre
  5. Sightsavers
  6. Fred Hollows Foundation
  7. SEVA Foundation
  8. British Council for the Prevention of Blindness
  9. Christian Blind Mission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This project aimed to develop a menu of eye health indicators for countries to monitor eye health within universal health coverage. By reviewing the literature and conducting two rounds of prioritization exercises with global eye health experts, a final menu of 22 indicators, including 7 core indicators, was established, ensuring they are feasible, actionable, reliable, and internationally comparable for the monitoring of eye health in 2020 and beyond.
Introduction In its recent World Report on Vision, the WHO called for an updated approach to monitor eye health as part of universal health coverage (UHC). This project sought to develop a consensus among eye health experts from all world regions to produce a menu of indicators for countries to monitor eye health within UHC. Methods We reviewed the literature to create a long-list of indicators aligned to the conceptual framework for monitoring outlined in WHO's World Report on Vision. We recruited a panel of 72 global eye health experts (40% women) to participate in a two-round, online prioritisation exercise. Two-hundred indicators were presented in Round 1 and participants prioritised each on a 4-point Likert scale. The highest-ranked 95 were presented in Round 2 and were (1) scored against four criteria (feasible, actionable, reliable and internationally comparable) and (2) ranked according to their suitability as a 'core' indicator for collection by all countries. The top 30 indicators ranked by these two parameters were then used as the basis for the steering group to develop a final menu. Results The menu consists of 22 indicators, including 7 core indicators, that represent important concepts in eye health for 2020 and beyond, and are considered feasible, actionable, reliable and internationally comparable. Conclusion We believe this list can inform the development of new national eye health monitoring frameworks, monitor progress on key challenges to eye health and be considered in broader UHC monitoring indices at national and international levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available