4.5 Article

Inter-rater reliability of assessments regarding the quality of drug treatment, and drug-related hospital admissions

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 10, Pages 3825-3834

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14790

Keywords

adverse drug reaction; inter‐ rater agreement; pharmacotherapy; prescribing quality

Funding

  1. ALF grants, Region Vastra Gotaland [ALFGBG-716941]
  2. Vetenskapsradet [2013-02639]
  3. Vinnova [2013-02639] Funding Source: Vinnova
  4. Swedish Research Council [2013-02639] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  5. Forte [2013-02639] Funding Source: Forte

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overall, there was a high level of agreement among assessors regarding the quality of drug treatment at admission and discharge, but a lower agreement on the association between drug treatment and hospital admission. In cases where hospital admission was possibly attributable to a prescribing error, assessors had poor agreement. Therefore, involving specialist physicians is recommended for more reliable assessments on both drug treatment quality and its impact on hospital admission.
Aims To investigate inter-rater agreement on the quality of drug treatment, and the relationship between the drug treatment and hospital admission. Methods Three specialist physicians and two resident physicians determined, independently and in consensus, the quality of drug treatment from an overall medical perspective, and its association with admission, in 30 randomly selected patients (50% female, median age 72 years) admitted to Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, in April 2018. The inter-rater agreement was evaluated with Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC(1)). Results In all, 200 (95%) out of 210 drugs at admission and 238 (97%) out of 245 drugs at discharge were assessed as reasonable drug treatment by all assessors. Conversely, none of the drugs at admission, and two at discharge, were assessed as unreasonable drug treatment by all assessors (AC(1): 0.88 and 0.94 [all], 0.86 and 0.95 [specialists], 0.92 and 0.92 [residents], respectively). The assessments regarding the association between the drug treatment and the hospital admission (not related or main/contributory reason) were consistent between the assessors for 16 out of 30 patients (AC(1): 0.67 [all], 0.74 [specialists], 0.54 [residents]). In none of the three cases where the hospital admission was considered possibly attributable to a prescribing error did the assessors make consistent assessments. Conclusions As the inter-rater agreement ranged between weak and almost perfect, the reliability of assessments of drug treatment quality, as well as adverse consequences, appears to be a methodological concern. To yield acceptably reliable results regarding both drug treatment aspects at issue, specialist physicians should be involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available