4.4 Article

Incidence (2008-2015) of post-traumatic headaches in United States military personnel

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 436-443

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1878555

Keywords

Headache; post-traumatic; head trauma; brain injury; incidence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, a study found a significant increase in the incidence of post-traumatic headaches in the US military, with Army males being more likely to be diagnosed with post-traumatic headaches. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of post-traumatic headaches on military personnel.
Objective: To conduct a descriptive transversal study to evaluate the incidence and demographic characteristics of post-traumatic headache using data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of data from 2008 to 2015 based on the International Classification of Diseases codes for both acute and chronic post-traumatic headache. Results: A total of 17,010 new cases of post-traumatic headaches were diagnosed among active duty military personnel. Reported incidence rates of post-traumatic headaches in the military increased 29-fold over the timeframe analyzed. Males enlisted in the Army were more likely to be diagnosed with post-traumatic headaches than females (O/E = 0.76), other branches, and officers. Conclusion: Findings of this study indicate that there is a significant incidence of post-traumatic headaches in the U.S. military. However, the incidence rates of post-traumatic headaches in the military are much lower than what was expected considering the number of traumatic brain injuries in the United States military reported by the Department of Defense for the same period. Additional research is needed to further evaluate these differences and the impact of PTHs on military personnel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available