4.5 Review

The evolving concept of indications for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation during first complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 1257-1265

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01247-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Aichi Cancer Research Foundation [2020-1-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The longstanding debate regarding allogeneic HCT for AML patients in CR1 remains unsettled, but advancements in understanding disease molecular pathogenesis and transplantation practices are continuously evolving the indications for this treatment approach.
The long-standing debate of whether patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) should proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during first complete remission (CR1) remains unsettled. Although allogeneic HCT during CR1 used to be recommended for those with intermediate or poor cytogenetics if they had a matched sibling donor, the concept of indications for allogeneic HCT during CR1 has been evolving by virtue of advances in understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of AML and innovations in transplantation practice attained over the last few decades. The incorporation of molecular profiles of leukemia has been shown to contribute to further refinements of risk classification that had previously relied mostly on cytogenetics, while the progress in transplantation procedures has made it possible to perform transplantations more safely even for patients without a matched sibling donor. These significant changes have underpinned the need to reappraise indications for allogeneic HCT during CR1 of AML. Improvements in clinical applications of genetic and measurable residual disease information as well as in transplantation technology are expected to further refine indications for allogeneic HCT during CR1, and thus promote an individualized approach for the treatment of AML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available