4.6 Article

Nitrous oxide versus lidocaine versus no analgesic for in-office hysteroscopy: a randomised clinical trial

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16657

Keywords

Analgesia; hysteroscopy; nitrous oxide

Funding

  1. Biomedical Research Foundation of the University Hospital 'Principe de Asturias' [Histeroscopia-2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effect of inhaled nitrous oxide (INO) with 1% lidocaine paracervical infiltration and no analgesic in pain control during in-office hysteroscopy. The results showed that INO was as effective as 1% lidocaine in pain control and better tolerated by patients, while the no-analgesic group had the poorest results.
Objective To compare the effect of inhaled nitrous oxide (INO) on pain control during in-office hysteroscopy with 1% lidocaine paracervical infiltration and no analgesic. Design Single-blind stratified randomised clinical trial with masked assessment by a third party. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Spanish hospital. Population Women who underwent hysteroscopy. Methods Patients were stratified into three groups according to the purpose of the hysteroscopy (biopsy, polypectomy or tubal sterilisation) and then assigned to different treatment groups through a permuted-blocks randomisation within strata. Pain scale was provided by a gynaecologist totally blinded to procedures and treatments. Effects were assessed using a one-way analysis of variance following an intention-to-treat approach. Main outcome measures Visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 mm. Results A total of 314 women were included: 105 to INO, 104 to 1% lidocaine and 105 to no analgesic. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Mean VAS score after the procedure was 34.7 +/- 25.8 mm, 36.1 +/- 22.9 mm (P = 1.0) and 47.3 +/- 28.2 mm (P = 0.001) for INO, 1% lidocaine and no analgesic, respectively. No adverse events were reported in 91 (86.7%) patients in the INO group compared with 79 (76%) in the 1%-lidocaine group (P = 0.04) and 85 (81%) in the no-analgesic group (P = 0.26). Conclusion INO was as effective as 1% lidocaine in pain control for in-office hysteroscopy and was better tolerated. The no-analgesic group presented the poorer results, so was the least recommended clinical option.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available