4.7 Review

Flavoprotein monooxygenases: Versatile biocatalysts

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107712

Keywords

Baeyer-Villiger oxidation; biocatalysis; dearomatization; epoxidation; flavin; halogenation; hydroxylation; oxygenation; (hydro)peroxide; microbial degradation

Funding

  1. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU) [20019/625]
  2. German Research Council (DFG) [GRK 2341]
  3. Federal Ministry for Innovation, Science and Research of North Rhine-Westphalia [PtJ-TRI/1411ng006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flavoprotein monooxygenases (FPMOs) have evolved from model enzymes in mechanistic flavoprotein research to biotechnologically relevant catalysts for sustainable production of valuable chemicals. FPMOs are classified based on protein structural properties and electron donor specificities, with each group catalyzing different types of oxygenation reactions. Engineering strategies have been utilized to enhance the robustness and applicability of FPMOs.
Flavoprotein monooxygenases (FPMOs) are single- or two-component enzymes that catalyze a diverse set of chemo-, regio- and enantioselective oxyfunctionalization reactions. In this review, we describe how FPMOs have evolved from model enzymes in mechanistic flavoprotein research to biotechnologically relevant catalysts that can be applied for the sustainable production of valuable chemicals. After a historical account of the development of the FPMO field, we explain the FPMO classification system, which is primarily based on protein structural properties and electron donor specificities. We then summarize the most appealing reactions catalyzed by each group with a focus on the different types of oxygenation chemistries. Wherever relevant, we report engineering strategies that have been used to improve the robustness and applicability of FPMOs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available