4.7 Article

Soil Seed Banks, Alternative Stable State Theory, and Ecosystem Resilience

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 7, Pages 697-707

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab011

Keywords

alternative stable states; ecosystem resilience; warning indicator; restoration; soil seed bank

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC0507701]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31922062, 41671246, DEB-1856383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composition of both aboveground and belowground plant communities plays a crucial role in ecosystem restoration and stability, with a current focus mainly on aboveground vegetation. Integrating seed bank dynamics into alternative stable state theory can reveal the importance of the relationship between the two, enhancing system resilience and reducing the likelihood of transitioning to undesirable states.
In restoration ecology, the transition from desired to degraded state is based solely on the composition of the aboveground plant community, whereas belowground propagules are often neglected. We developed a conceptual framework integrating seed bank dynamics into alternative stable state theory, highlighting the important relationship between aboveground and belowground composition. This integration emphasizes the role of resilience in systems that appear to have shifted to an undesirable state. Belowground propagules, especially soil seed and bud banks, provide buffering capacity and may serve as valuable indicators of potential resistance to state transition based on the degree of similarity between belowground and aboveground vegetation composition. Ecosystem states may have multiple components that differ in their rate of change, as well as in their capacity to promote resilience. We recommend that the application of alternative stable state theory from a management perspective should incorporate components of both above- and belowground vegetation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available