4.7 Article

Advancing Landscape and Seascape Ecology from a 2D to a 3D Science

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages 596-608

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab001

Keywords

habitat complexity; lidar; photogrammetry; remote sensing; 3D visualization

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landscape ecology has shifted from a focus on two-dimensional spatial patterning to studying three-dimensional structures, enabling ecologists to gain new insights into the relationship between spatial patterns and ecological processes. Technological advances in high-resolution remote sensing have allowed for the mapping of complex ecosystem structures in three dimensions, leading to more realistic models of the environment and paving the way for future ecological research.
Landscape ecology has fundamentally changed the way ecologists view the world through a greater understanding of the links between spatial patterns and ecological processes. Until recently, landscape ecology has been largely a two-dimensional (2D) science focused on the spatial patterning of 2D planar surfaces rather than three-dimensional (3D) structures. Advances in high-resolution remote sensing technologies, such as laser altimetry, acoustic sensors, and photogrammetry now provide the capability to map complex ecosystem structure in three dimensions, creating more structurally realistic models of the environment. In the present article, we focus on high-resolution 3D structure, using terrestrial and marine examples to illustrate how state-of-the-art advances in landscape ecology achieved through novel data fusion, spatial analysis, and geovisualization of environmental data can provide new ecological insights. These examples provide a look to the future in landscape and seascape ecology, where continued progress toward a multidimensional science will fundamentally shift the way we view, explore, and conceptualize the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available