4.5 Article

Determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in milk samples. Development of green extraction coupled techniques for sample preparation

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 38, Issue 3-4, Pages 460-468

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201600247

Keywords

Cloud point extraction; Experimental design; Milk samples; Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Ultrasound-assisted extraction

Funding

  1. CONICET
  2. UNCuyo
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 2012-2429]
  4. Organization for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons [L/ICA/ICB/192151/14]
  5. UNCuyo (SeCTyP-UNCuyo) [06/M062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), cloud point extraction (CPE), and ultrasound backextraction (UABE) techniques have been coupled for lixiviation, preconcentration, and cleanup of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) frommilk samples for determination by gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD). Physicochemical parameters that affect the efficiency of the extraction system were investigated using a design of experiments based on multivariate statistical tools, and considering the sample matrix along the development. The coupling of the leaching step, UAE, enhanced ca. 3.5 times the extraction efficiency of the former sample preparation methodology (CPE-UABE) leading to cleaner sample extracts suitable forGC analysis. Under optimum conditions, the proposed methodology exhibits successful performance in terms of linearity and precision, with recoveries in the range of 68-70% and LODs within the range 0.05-0.5 ng/g dry weight (d.w.). The proposed sample preparation methodology coupled three green analytical techniques. It expands the application frontiers of CPE for the analysis of biological samples by GC. The optimized methodology was used for determination of PBDEs in powder milk samples, from both commercial and human sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available