4.4 Review

Drug Discovery Insights from Medicinal Beetles in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Journal

BIOMOLECULES & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 105-126

Publisher

KOREAN SOC APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2020.229

Keywords

Beetle; Traditional Chinese Medicine; Traditional Korean Medicine; Coleoptera; Chemical defense; Secondary metabolites

Funding

  1. Siena College
  2. Chinese. A Fulbright US Scholar Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been a primary source of medical treatment in East Asia for thousands of years, incorporating a wide variety of materia medica including insects like beetles. Research found that 48 species of beetles from 34 genera in TCM contain 129 chemical constituents with documented uses in Traditional Korean Medicine (TKM).
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) was the primary source of medical treatment for the people inhabiting East Asia for thousands of years. These ancient practices have incorporated a wide variety of materia medica including plants, animals and minerals. As modern sciences, including natural products chemistry, emerged, there became increasing efforts to explore the chemistry of this materia medica to find molecules responsible for their traditional use. Insects, including beetles have played an important role in TCM. In our survey of texts and review articles on TCM materia medica, we found 48 species of beetles from 34 genera in 14 different families that are used in TCM. This review covers the chemistry known from the beetles used in TCM, or in cases where a species used in these practices has not been chemically studied, we discuss the chemistry of closely related beetles. We also found several documented uses of beetles in Traditional Korean Medicine (TKM), and included them where appropriate. There are 129 chemical constituents of beetles discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available