4.7 Review

Translating Interventional Neuroscience to Suicide: It's About Time

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 89, Issue 11, Pages 1073-1083

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.01.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VA Clinical Science Research and Development [IK2 CX001824]
  2. Brain Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD) Young Investigator Award
  3. VA Health Services Research and Development [I01 HX002572, HX002972]
  4. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH112674, R01MH110379, R01MH108610]
  5. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20 GM130452, P20GM125507]
  6. VA Rehabilitation Research and Development [I01 RX002450]
  7. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention [SRG111918]
  8. VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology [RX002864]
  9. Neuronetics
  10. NeoSync
  11. AffectNeuro
  12. Nexstim
  13. Janssen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite advancements in psychiatric and psychological treatments, suicide rates continue to rise. One reason for this could be the lack of integration between neurocircuitry models and contemporary suicide theories. Another challenge is the variable nature of suicide risk over time, which requires closer attention in intervention studies. Future research should focus on real-time tracking and biologically based interventions to develop more effective strategies for suicide reduction.
Despite significant advances in psychiatric and psychological treatment over the last 30 years, suicide deaths have increased. Unfortunately, neuroscience insights have yielded few translational interventions that specifically target suicidal thoughts and behaviors. In our view, this is attributable to two factors. The first factor is our limited integration of neurocircuitry models with contemporary suicide theory. The second challenge is inherent to the variable nature of suicide risk over time. Few interventional neuroscience studies evaluate how temporal fluctuations in risk affect treatment, despite evidence that temporality is a key component distinguishing suicide phenotypes. To wit, individual variability in risk trajectories may provide different treatment targets to engage as a patient moves between suicidal ideation and attempt. Here, we first review contemporary ideation-to-action theories of suicide from a neurobiological perspective, focusing on valence and executive function circuits and the key role of state-induced (e.g., within stressful contexts) functional modulation on longitudinal risk trajectories. We then describe neural correlates of suicide reduction following various interventions, ranging from circuit specific (i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation) to broader pharmacological (i.e., ketamine, lithium) to psychological (i.e., brief cognitive therapy). We then introduce novel strategies for tracking risk in naturalistic settings and real time using ecological momentary interventions. We provide a critical integration of the literature focusing on the intersection between targets and temporality, and we conclude by proposing novel research designs integrating real-time and biologically based interventions to generate novel strategies for future suicide reduction research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available