4.6 Article

Non-nutritive sweetener activation of the pig sweet taste receptor T1R2-T1R3 in vitro mirrors sweetener stimulation of the gut-expressed receptor in vivo

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.032

Keywords

Taste; T1R2-T1R3; Non-nutritive sweeteners; Pig; Intestine

Funding

  1. Pancosma
  2. Wellcome Trust Value In People (VIP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates notable differences among species in the ability to detect certain non-nutritive sweeteners, attributed to amino acid substitutions and pseudogenization of taste receptor genes. Using pig models, it was shown that commonly used non-nutritive sweeteners such as sucralose, saccharin, and acesulfame K activate the T1R2-T1R3 receptor, while aspartame and cyclamate do not.
The perception of sweet is mediated by the sweet taste receptor T1R2-T1R3 expressed in taste cells of the lingual epithelium. This receptor is also expressed in intestinal enteroendocrine cells and is required for sensing luminal sugars and sweeteners to regulate expression of intestinal Na+-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1). There are some notable differences amongst species in the ability to detect certain non-nutritive (artificial) sweeteners. Amino acid substitutions and pseudogenization of taste receptor genes are responsible for these disparities. Using heterologous expression, we demonstrate that the commonly used non-nutritive sweeteners sucralose, saccharin and acesulfame K activate pig T1R2-T1R3, but that aspartame and cyclamate do not. Furthermore, we show that in vitro sweetener activation of pig T1R2-T1R3 mirrors the sweetener stimulation of the gut-expressed receptor in vivo. Considering that sweeteners are included in animal feed worldwide, determination of taste receptor specificities in different species is essential for the development of scientifically-based dietary formulations. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available