4.5 Review

Social mechanisms in crowdsourcing contests: a literature review

Journal

BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 1080-1114

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1880638

Keywords

Behaviour; crowdsourcing contests; social mechanisms; literature review; seeker behaviour; solver behaviour

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crowdsourcing contests provide a platform for organizations to engage with external workforce, attracting considerable research interest from the social mechanism perspective. The stakeholders involved, including individuals and large-scale organizations, exhibit a variety of behavior predictors. The review identifies key tensions and recommendations for future research to enhance understanding of seeker and solver behavior.
Crowdsourcing contests allow organisations to engage with an external workforce. Over the years, the phenomenon has attracted considerable research interest. In the present review, we synthesise the crowdsourcing contest literature by adopting the social mechanism lens. We begin by observing that stakeholders in crowdsourcing contests range from individuals (solvers) to large-scale organisations (seekers). Given that such vastly different entities interact during a crowdsourcing contest, it is expected that their behaviour, too, can have a varying range of predictors, such as individual and organisational factors. However, prior reviews on Crowdsourcing contests and crowdsourcing, in general, haven't explored the phenomenon's multi-layered nature. In addressing this gap, we synthesise 127 scholarly articles and identify underlying social mechanisms that explain key behavioural outcomes of seekers and solvers. Our review makes two specific contributions. First, we determine three distinct tensions that emerge from the key design decisions that might be at odds with the central principle of crowdsourcing contests: broadcast search for solutions from a long-tail of solvers. Second, we provide three recommendations for future research that, we believe, could provide a richer understanding of the seeker and solver behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available