4.7 Article

Two-step feedback preparation of entanglement for qubit systems with time delay

Journal

AUTOMATICA
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109174

Keywords

Stochastic quantum systems; Lyapunov method; Feedback control; Bell states; GHZ entanglement

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP190101566, DP180101805]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States [FA2386-16-1-4065]
  3. Centres of Excellence [CE170100012]
  4. U.S. office of Naval Research Global [N62909-19-1-2129]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation, PR China [61828303, 61873251, 61833010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study designed two control strategies based on the Lyapunov method to prepare a class of entangled states for qubit systems with a constant delay time, and numerical results showed the effectiveness of these two proposed control strategies.
Quantum entanglement plays a fundamental role in quantum computation and quantum communication. Feedback control has been widely used in stochastic quantum systems to generate given entangled states since it has good robustness, where the time required to compute filter states and conduct filter-based control usually cannot be ignored in many practical applications. This paper designed two control strategies based on the Lyapunov method to prepare a class of entangled states for qubit systems with a constant delay time. The first one is bang-bang-like control strategy, which has a simple form with switching between a constant value and zero, the stability of which is proved. Another control strategy is switching Lyapunov control, where a constant delay time is introduced in the filter-based feedback control law to compensate for the computation time. Numerical results on a two-qubit system illustrate the effectiveness of these two proposed control strategies. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available