4.0 Article

Symmetry energy and neutron pressure of finite nuclei using the relativistic mean-field formalism

Journal

ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
Volume 342, Issue 1-2, Pages 462-468

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asna.202113951

Keywords

relativistic mean-field model; relativistic-Hartree-Bogoliubov approach; coherent density fluctuation model; local density approximation; symmetry energy; neutron pressure; infinite nuclear matter; shell/sub-shell closure

Funding

  1. CNPq Brazil
  2. FAPESP [2017/05660-0]
  3. FOSTECT [FOSTECT.2019B.04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the isospin and Z-dependency of the effective symmetry energy and neutron pressure for the isotonic chain of neutron magic N = 40, and 82. It found a notable sign of shell/sub-shell closure and compared the performance of the coherent density fluctuation model and Liquid-Drop-Approximation in including the surface effect of finite nuclei.
The present study investigates the isospin and Z-dependency of the effective symmetry energy and its co-efficient, namely, neutron pressure for the isotonic chain of neutron magic N = 40, and 82. The relativistic mean-field model with the non-linear NL3* parameter and Relativistic-Hartree-Bogoliubov approach with density-dependent DD-ME2 parameter sets are used for the analysis. The coherent density fluctuation model and Liquid-Drop-Approximation are adopted to formulate the nuclear matter observables such as symmetry energy, neutron pressure of finite nuclei at local density. We found a notable sign of the shell/sub-shell closure following the proton magic over the isotonic chain. Further, a comparative analysis shows that the coherent density fluctuation model is a better approximation to include the surface effect of finite nuclei as compared to the Liquid-Drop-Approximation, which plays a significant role to determine the shell/sub-shell closure over an isotopic and/or isotonic chain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available