4.6 Article

Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

Journal

ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 44, Issue 7, Pages 957-963

Publisher

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.01.018

Keywords

Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision; Stage II-III rectal Cancer; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 109-2314-B-037-035, MOST 109-2314-B-037-040, MOST 109-2314-B-037-046-MY3]
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123006, MOHW107-TDUB-212-114026B, MOHW108-TDUB-212-133006, MOHW109-TDUB-212-134026, MOHW109-TDU-B-212-114006]
  3. health and welfare surcharge on tobacco products
  4. Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital [KMUH109-9R32, KMUH109-9R33, KMUH109-9R34, KMUH109-9M30, KMUH109-9M31, KMUH109-9M32, KMUH109-9M33, KMUH-DK109003, KMUH-DK109005similar to3, KMUHS10903, KMUHSA10903]
  5. KMU Center for Cancer Research [KMU-TC108A04-2]
  6. KMU Center for Liquid Biopsy [KMU-TC109B05]
  7. Kaohsiung Medical University
  8. Grant of Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the oncological outcomes of patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Results showed that robotic-assisted TME is safe and effective for treating stage II-III rectal cancer patients, with acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. It may be considered as a therapeutic alternative for salvage surgery in T4 tumors invading adjacent organs.
Aims: This study analyzed the oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: We enrolled 109 consecutive patients with stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent robotic-assisted TME after neoadjuvant CCRT at one hospital between July 2013 and June 2018. Results: All 109 patients underwent preoperative CCRT. Of them, 37 (33.9%) achieved a pathologic complete response, and 29 (26.6%) experienced relapse, with local recurrence in 9 (8.3%) and distant metastasis in 20 (18.3%). R0 resection was performed in 104 (95.7%) patients; however, 7 (6.7%) of them developed local recurrence and 17 (16.3%) developed distant metastasis. Over a median follow-up of 42 months, the 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 73.4% and 87.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted TME after neoadjuvant CCRT is safe and effective for treating patients with stage II-III rectal cancer in one institution with acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. It may be a therapeutic alternative to salvage surgery for T4 tumors invading adjacent organs, such as the bladder, prostate, and uterus. (c) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available