4.2 Article

Frontline Health Care Workers' Mental Workload During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Journal

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 33, Issue 2-3, Pages 303-305

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1010539521997257

Keywords

COVID-19; mental workload; NASA-TLX; cross-sectional study; health care workers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China did not experience as high mental workload as expected. They were satisfied with their performance and had low levels of frustration. Effort, physical demand, and mental demand were identified as important dimensions of mental workload.
Workload is an essential factor affecting the performance of health care workers (HCWs). High level of mental workload increased their risks of insomnia, anxiety, and depression. This study committed to investigate frontline HCWs' mental workload and analyze its influencing factors during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A total of 802 frontline HCWs completed the online questionnaires. Their total mental workload score was 69.7 +/- 16.4. Frontline HCWs were satisfied with their performance (4.0 +/- 3.3) and showed a low level of frustration (8.3 +/- 5.7). The most important dimensions of mental workload were effort (16.4 +/- 13.7), physical demand (15.7 +/- 4.7), and mental demand (12.9 +/- 5.2). Frontline nurses and HCWs who have higher education level, longer working years, and higher professional title perceived higher mental workload scores (P < .05). In conclusion, frontline HCWs' mental workload was not high as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. They have made tremendous efforts and dedication to caring for COVID-19 patients. Job-related factors, some of which can be eliminated by proper management skills, increased frontline HCWs mental workload.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available