4.7 Article

Performance assessment of a triangular microchannel active magnetic regenerator

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116519

Keywords

Active magnetic regenerator; Triangular microchannel; Heat transfer; Friction factor; Cooling capacity

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201708440210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully improved the stability of magnetocaloric materials by shaping La(Fe,Si,Mn)(13)H-y into a regenerator with triangular microchannels, and comprehensively characterized its heat transfer and cooling performance. It shows promising potential for enhancing the operational coefficient of performance in specific magnetic refrigerators.
The manufacturing process and mechanical instability of high performance magnetocaloric materials hamper the implementation of novel geometries for active magnetic regenerators. In this work, La(Fe,Si,Mn)(13)H-y is shaped into a regenerator with triangular microchannels with a hydraulic diameter of 200-300 mu m using a process that results in a highly stable structure. The regenerator is characterized with regards to heat transfer, hydraulic resistance, magnetocaloric cooling and mechanical stability. The cooling performance is similar to conventional packed bed AMRs but with a significantly lower flow resistance. The chemical and mechanical stabilities are validated by comparisons of heat transfer effectiveness, pressure drop and magnetocaloric properties of the regenerator before and after long-term testing. The machining accuracy of microchannels with a brittle magnetocaloric material is therefore qualified. According to the performance evaluation criterion, this regenerator has a good potential for maximizing the operational coefficient of performance, with an estimated 42% improvement of COP in a specific magnetic refrigerator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available