4.6 Article

Utilizing complex oxide substrates to control carrier concentration in large-area monolayer MoS2 films

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 118, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0038383

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1539918]
  2. NSF MRSEC program [DMR-1719875]
  3. NSF [DMR-1338010]
  4. Kavli Institute at Cornell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bandgap engineering is crucial for heterojunction device design, where controlling carrier concentration in monolayer-thick materials like MoS2 is achieved through growth on various substrates. This approach allows for precise carrier concentration control in large-scale heterostructures involving monolayer-thick materials.
Bandgap engineering is central to the design of heterojunction devices. For heterojunctions involving monolayer-thick materials like MoS2, the carrier concentration of the atomically thin film can vary significantly depending on the amount of charge transfer between MoS2 and the substrate. This makes substrates with a range of charge neutrality levels-as is the case for complex oxide substrates-a powerful addition to electrostatic gating or chemical doping to control the doping of overlying MoS2 layers. We demonstrate this approach by growing monolayer MoS2 on perovskite (SrTiO3 and LaAlO3), spinel (MgAl2O4), and SiO2 substrates with multi-inch uniformity. The as-grown MoS2 films on these substrates exhibit a controlled, reproducible, and uniform carrier concentration ranging from (1-4) x10(13)cm(-2), depending on the oxide substrate employed. The observed carrier concentrations are further confirmed by our density-functional theory calculations based on ab initio mismatched interface theory (MINT). This approach is relevant to large-scale heterostructures involving monolayer-thick materials in which it is desired to precisely control carrier concentrations for applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available