4.7 Article

A pseudo-equilibrium finite element for limit analysis of Reissner-Mindlin plates

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 336-354

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.004

Keywords

Static theorem; Finite element; Reissner-Mindlin plate; Boundary layer; Shear locking; Second-order cone programming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new finite element is developed for the yield design of Reissner-Mindlin plates based on the static theorem of limit analysis. The proposed procedure demonstrates excellent performance on numerical tests, showing that not strictly satisfying the equilibrium equations and mechanical boundary conditions is not a disadvantage, although the solution may develop boundary layers along certain types of edges.
A new finite element is developed for the yield design of Reissner-Mindlin plates based on the static theorem of limit analysis. This three-node triangular element satisfies the equi-librium equations and the mechanical boundary conditions on average, and, as such, it is not expected lower bounds on the collapse load from the computed results. The yield cri-terion is, however, exactly satisfied throughout the element. The relatively small nonlinear convex optimization problem posed here is treated as second-order cone programming and solved with a primal-dual interior-point algorithm implemented in the MOSEK optimiza-tion package. The proposed procedure exhibits excellent performance on a series of numer-ical tests, demonstrating that not satisfying the equilibrium equations and the mechanical boundary conditions rigorously is far from being a handicap. It is also observed that the solution may develop boundary layer along certain types of edges. This real physical phe-nomenon, likely to be manifested in Reissner-Mindlin plate solutions and that nearly no attention has been paid in the framework of yield design, is a source of convergence de-lay. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available