Journal
APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107656
Keywords
Sound insulation; Thermal insulation; Coupling loss factor; Cladding; ETICS; Lightweight
Categories
Funding
- FFG (Osterreichische Forschungsforderungsgesellschaft) [864983]
- TU Wien Bibliothek
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Thermal cladding systems have evolved and may no longer rely on the original prediction models, signaling a need for improvement. Parameter studies have shown that behavior of thermal cladding systems can be predicted at high frequencies, but there are still inaccuracies in the predictions.
Thermal cladding systems have developed and modernised since the first systems were implemented, and predictions of single figure sound insulation improvement, Delta R-w, based on the natural frequency, f(0), of the spring-mass covering may no longer be reliable. To identify aspects of the compound acoustic behaviour due to multiple power flow paths of the thermal insulating system, a statistical energy analysis (SEA) based prediction model was developed. A simplified calculation of sound insulation improvement, Delta R, is described, allowing the high frequency (f > f(0)) behaviour of thermal cladding systems to be predicted. A parametric study in which the impact of different construction materials in the model is discussed; the damping constants, elastic properties of the interlayer and fixings, number of fixings, thickness and material properties (including bending stiffness) of the weatherproof outer layer and the heavyweight wall are assessed. While agreement within 4.0 dB (mean absolute differences) between calculated and measured results for thick render (>= 8.0 mm) and curtain wall systems can be obtained at high frequencies (f >f(0)) using the simplified methodology, this approach was not successful at predicting single figure values. This is because single figure values are weighted towards the low frequencies. Correlation of calculated f(0) with measured Delta R-w is slightly improved (r.m.s. differences of 2.62 compared with 3.21 using the f(0) calculation methodology in EN ISO12354 Annex D) when a modified method to calculate the combined stiffness is used. To improve predictions further, a methodology must be developed to obtain the transfer function, Y-tr, used to calculate non-resonant coupling loss factor due to the spring- mass resonance of thermal cladding on the heavyweight wall. The mobility of the connections, should also be accurately characterised to ensure accurate predictions at high frequencies. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available