4.7 Review

Analytical strategies for in-vivo evaluation of plant volatile - emissions A review

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1147, Issue -, Pages 240-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.029

Keywords

Biogenic volatile organic compounds; Living plants; Sampling; In-vivo analytical strategies; Quantification

Funding

  1. University of Turin, Turin (Italy)
  2. Division of Analytical Chemistry of the European Chemical Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review highlights the ecological role of BVOCs emitted by living plants and the techniques used for their analysis, emphasizing the importance and potential applications of in-vivo analysis in enhancing our understanding of plant behavior.
Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) are metabolites emitted by living plants that have a fundamental ecological role since they influence atmospheric chemistry, plant communication and pollinator/herbivore behaviour, and human activities. Over the years, several strategies have been developed to isolate and identify them, and to take advantage of their activity. The main techniques used for in-vivo analyses include dynamic headspace (D-HS), static headspace (S-HS) and, more recently, direct contact (DC) methods in association with gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (MS). The aim of this review is to provide insight into the in-vivo characterisation of plant volatile emissions with a focus on sampling, analysis and possible applications. This review first provides a critical discussion of the challenges associated with conventional approaches and their limitations and advantages. Then, it describes a series of applications of in-vivo volatilomic studies to enhance how the information they provide impact on our knowledge of plant behaviour, including the effects of abiotic (damage, flooding, climate) and biotic (insect feeding) stress factors in relation to the plants. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available