4.4 Article

Re-operative parathyroidectomy: How many positive localization studies are required?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 221, Issue 2, Pages 485-488

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.027

Keywords

Endocrine surgery; Localization; Reoperative parathyroidectomy; Hyperparathyroidism

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the number of localization studies prior to re-operative parathyroidectomy does not impact the surgical cure rates, and successful re-operative parathyroidectomy can be performed with minimal pre-operative scans in certain clinical contexts.
Background: Re-operative parathyroidectomy in patients with recurrent or persistent hyperparathyroidism can be challenging. We review our experience to determine the optimal number of localization studies prior to re-operation. Methods: From 2001 to 2019, 251 patients underwent re-operative parathyroidectomy. Parathyroidectomies were stratified to 4 groups based upon the number of positive localization studies obtained: A) ZERO, B) 1-positive, C) 2-positive, D) 3-positive. Results: The overall cure rate was 97%, where 201 single gland resections, 23 two-gland resections, 22 subtotal/total, and 5 forearm autograft resections were performed. Thirty-two patients had no positive studies (A), 172 patients had 1-positive (B), 42 patients had 2-positive (C), and 5 patients had 3-positive studies (D). There was no difference in surgical cure rates between groups (p = 0.71). The majority of patients had one or no positive imaging studies yet almost all still achieved cure. Conclusion: Successful re-operative parathyroidectomy can be performed with minimal pre-operative scans in certain clinical contexts. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available