4.6 Editorial Material

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2020 ISPD Practice Recommendations for Prescribing High-Quality Goal-Directed Peritoneal Dialysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 157-171

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.09.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sanofi Genzyme
  2. Baxter Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2020 ISPD practice recommendations emphasize a person-centered approach to peritoneal dialysis, with shared decision making and a broader view of individual issues. Due to the lack of strong evidence, the recommendations are labeled as practice points rather than being numerically graded. The commentary from the KDOQI work group calls for changes to the current clinical paradigm to provide more holistic and person-centered dialysis services.
The recently published 2020 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) practice recommendations regarding prescription of high-quality goal-directed peritoneal dialysis differ fundamentally from previous guidelines that focused on adequacy of dialysis. The new ISPD publication emphasizes the need for a person-centered approach with shared decision making between the individual performing peritoneal dialysis and the clinical care team while taking a broader view of the various issues faced by that individual. Cognizant of the lack of strong evidence for the recommendations made, they are labeled as practice points rather than being graded numerically. This commentary presents the views of a work group convened by the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) to assess these recommendations and assist clinical providers in the United States in interpreting and implementing them. This will require changes to the current clinical paradigm, including greater resource allocation to allow for enhanced services that provide a more holistic and person-centered assessment of the quality of dialysis delivered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available